Key Word Quick Search

Advanced Search

  Username

  

  Password

  

 

German Journal for Evidence and Quality in Health Care

Volume 106, Issue 3, 00-2012

   extended journal description

   back to online journals

   back to journal content

 



 Diagnostik und linked evidence – Wie robust muss die Kette sein?

German Journal for Evidence and Quality in Health Care

Volume 106, Issue 3, 00-2012

pp. 153-160 (8)

   read complete article (.pdf file)

Holger J. Schünemann; Reem Mustafa; Jan Brozek

Summary

In this article we describe the methodological underpinnings in assessing the confidence in estimates of effects (quality of evidence) for diagnostic questions and resulting recommendations in guidelines. In particular, we will describe current considerations and research regarding the link between data relating to diagnostic accuracy and patient important outcomes and how to move from evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies to recommendations. Our deliberations and suggestions, a result of an invited presentation at the annual fall conference of the German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Healthcare (IQWiG), are based on our work with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group.

(As supplied by publisher)

Keywords

Leitlinien; GRADE; Evidenz; Diagnostische Genauigkeit; guidelines; GRADE; evidence; diagnostic accuracy

DOI (Digital Object Identifier):   10.1016/j.zefq.2012.04.001


the "TOP 3" articles
Interprofessionelle Ausbildung für eine patientenzentrierte Versorgung der Zukunft. Die Entwicklung eines Kompetenzprofils ... (Cornelia Mahler; Sven Karstens; Marco Roos; Joachim Szecsenyi)
Versorgungsforschung: Innovationstransfer in der Klinischen Forschung (Matthias Schrappe; Peter C Scriba)
Arzneimitteltherapiesicherheit in Alten- und Pflegeheimen (Ulrich Jaehde; Petra A. Thürmann)
complete "TOP 10"